The argument that I am coming up with is not whether we should choose passion over and being financially stable financial stability comes first indefinitely so financial stability is the best. My argument is that once it is established that two jobs can become can make you financially stable then is any amount of additional income words sacrificing your passion your meaningful and purposeful work for

Well, what does this assumption or argument have anything to do with our debate? Could you elaborate? What is the question that you're asking me? What is the thing that you're arguing against?

Well, here if your argument is that what if somebody who is playing football who earned more and maybe they're not passionate about what they're doing? Do you think they'll be able to sustain that in the long-term even if they're getting paid more than somebody who swims as their career I guess because that's what your example says do you think somebody who gets paid more for playing football but is not passionate about? It will be able to do it long-term and do you think that is a sustainable source of income for them.