So here's the thing: AI doesn't finish a dead artist's work, it replaces it with something else entirely. When a studio feeds an unfinished song or film into a model, they're not recovering the artist's intent—they're averaging it out. The AI learns patterns from everything the artist ever made, then produces the most statistically likely next note, next frame. But art isn't about the most likely choice. It's about the surprising, irrational, deeply personal decisions that only a living person makes in the moment. By finishing it, you're creating a feedback loop where the studio owns the "completion," and the artist's actual voice gets buried under a smoothed-over imitation. It also changes how we see the original work—suddenly that unfinished piece becomes a marketing asset, not a human moment. And once you do it for one artist, you've established that no dead artist's work is truly finished. Everything becomes a draft waiting for a machine. That's a slippery slope we don't have to go down.

[No submission - Time expired]