Look, I get the appeal of AI music. It's cheap, it's fast, and it never gets tired. But letting it flood streaming platforms is a disaster waiting to happen. Think about the economics here. Real musicians spend years learning their craft, pouring money into studios, and building a following. Then an algorithm churns out a thousand songs a day, clogs up the algorithms, and drowns out actual human work. Streaming already pays artists pennies. Adding infinite AI competition doesn't just hurt them—it breaks the whole system. The platforms become noise machines. And without skin in the game, nobody's taking artistic risks. You get formulaic slop designed to game playlists. That's not culture. That's just cheap filler crowding out real creativity.

Look, you're saying it's disrespect to artists, and I agree. But let me give you a concrete scenario. Imagine you're a bedroom musician who spent two years writing, recording, and mixing an album. You finally release it on Spotify. That same week, some company drops 10,000 AI-generated "lo-fi beats to study to" that sound just like yours. The algorithm buries your work before anyone hears it. You're not wrong that AI can make music. But the problem isn't the tech itself—it's the lack of friction. Streaming platforms already have terrible discovery. Adding infinite supply with zero human cost makes them fragile. One disruption, and the whole ecosystem collapses into noise. And let's be real: who takes the risk when you can just prompt a hit? Nobody. That's how you kill innovation, not help it.

[No submission - Time expired]