The other side will say AI songs are just more content, more variety, and artists get nothing anyway from streaming. But that misses the whole point. This isn't about quantity or even royalties. It's about what music means to us as humans. When you stream a song, you're connecting with another person's experience. AI has no experience. It's just pattern matching. Allowing AI-generated songs on the same platforms as human artists drowns out real voices in a flood of fake ones. It also creates a fairness problem: AI can pump out thousands of tracks overnight, making it nearly impossible for a human musician to compete. Is that right? From a utilitarian view, it might maximize cheap entertainment. But from a deontological perspective, it deceives listeners who assume a song came from a human heart. Virtue ethics asks what kind of music culture we're building. We're choosing noise over meaning. Streaming platforms should stay human spaces.

Remember when that AI-generated Drake and The Weeknd song went viral last year? It got millions of streams before it was pulled. But here's the thing – a lot of listeners only found out it wasn't them because of the news coverage. That's the problem in a nutshell. If AI songs are allowed on the same platforms, listeners can't tell what's real anymore. And once you break that trust, it's gone. Now, your argument about Sung Jinwo

[No submission - Time expired]