my perspective is if a read books they can get to learn new words and we an also state the books is useful rather than a whole tv , tablet and phone case they need charging we can get distercted in I while a book is long and easy to carry
I heard most books people buy never get read. That's weirdly telling. Books are just slow, heavy things that demand too much, while other formats give you stories quicker. The other side can love them, but I'm not sold.
books are sold if a person has interest and how do they get intrest simple by knowing it advantages too much screen times can cause u eyes sore or even addictive while books are less affordable then electrnocs
Aren't books just something people feel guilty about not finishing? My opponent makes a fair point about no charging, I guess. But still, a book sits there forever while you get the same story faster elsewhere. I just don't see the appeal.
sure books can sometimes be really slow but why not just admit it suspense is way better then kniwung the end like when u know story is about to finish and what is the ending u probably wont enjoy the ending that much cause u know it already but books makes it impossible to just know the ending right away and admit it peoples like suspense then spoiler alerts
My opponent makes a fair point about screens hurting eyes and needing charging. Still, books feel like a slow chore to me. A lot of readers just want the story without the weight and commitment. I am not sure how to argue it better, but that is my gut feeling.