Look, here's the thing - AI can mimic style but it can't replicate intent. When a studio uses AI to finish a dead artist's work, they're guessing at what that person would have wanted. And that's not just disrespectful, it's misleading to audiences. The practical consequence is that we end up with a fake. Not a real completion by the artist, but a corporate approximation dressed up to look authentic. It cheapens their actual body of work and sets a terrible precedent. Where does it stop? If we let studios do this for one project, they'll do it for every unfinished work they can get their hands on. I get that fans want closure on unfinished projects. But that closure shouldn't come at the cost of the artist's legacy. Let their work speak for itself, incomplete and all.

[No submission - Time expired]