I was scrolling through a playlist last week and hit a track that felt... off. Perfectly produced, but hollow. Turned out it was AI-generated. And that's the thing — it got pushed onto the same platform as a broke musician's bedroom recording. That's not fair. Look, I get the appeal: infinite music, no artist burnout, cheap content for playlists. But streaming platforms are where real human artistry gets discovered. If we flood them with algorithm songs, we're crowding out actual voices. The economics shift too — these platforms already pay fractions of a cent per stream. Add infinite AI output, and the tiny slice left for human creators shrinks even further. I'm not saying AI music shouldn't exist. But streaming is a shared cultural space. It should prioritize human expression, not synthetic filler. Otherwise we're just trading genuine connection for convenient noise.

You say AI gives people leverage to express emotions, but who's actually expressing? The machine isn't feeling anything, and the person typing prompts isn't pouring their heart out — they're curating a vibe. That's not the same as a songwriter wrestling with a chord progression at 3am. And yeah, I get that tools can empower people. But streaming is a shared space. If you flood it with infinite AI tracks, real human voices get buried under an avalanche of polished nothing. Discovery already sucks for independent artists. This makes it worse. Plus, there's the money angle. Streaming pays fractions of a cent. Now imagine platforms filling catalogues with AI songs that cost nothing to make. The tiny pot of revenue left for actual musicians shrinks even more. That's not democratization — that's drowning out the humans while the algorithms collect the data. If AI music wants to live somewhere, fine. But streaming platforms should stay human territory.

[No submission - Time expired]