Imagine someone buys a print, sees a famous cartoonist's signature, and thinks it's real. That feels like tricking people, even if the other side calls it homage. I can't really argue back, but my gut says it's just wrong.
I agree for the FOR side. People should learn what is right and what is wrong. And then, when they do that, they will know what to do and what to not do. What happens after that is that person is learning. the reason is learning, they are just telling AI to add their signature on there for fun. Not so they can buy.
The thing is, a signature is meant to tell you who made it, so faking it still misleads even if it's for fun. My opponent makes a fair point about learning, and I'm not sure how to argue back. It just feels like forgery to me.