We actually agree on something: the other side's own example, Lebanon, shows what happens when communities live side by side without a shared civic identity. That's my whole case, so it's generous of them to make it for me. My opponent says multiculturalism is doomed, then argues for it. Strange strategy. My point is simpler: diversity without integration doesn't produce harmony, it produces parallel streets. What holds a country together is a shared language, shared rules, and loyalty to the whole. Multiculturalism as policy often skips that step entirely.