Are you asking to debate the existence of Christianity? If so we can start a new debate, but unfortunately that's not the current topic.
I believe schools should get rid of their letter grading system and replace it with feedback because it shifts a student's goal of getting a "good grade" to actually improving their skills. To expand, when a grade is received, students generally don't know what it really means. In their eyes, they merely see that they passed or failed. This prevents the desire to change, and if it's wanted, students will have a harder time knowing where to start. Written feedback promotes the idea that you can always improve your skills, regardless of how knowledgeable you are, motivating students to become the best versions of themselves.
And although some may argue that grading shows the student their measurable level of understanding, grading is inconsistent as every teacher has a different criteria. Some include homework, while others take note of behavior. There are teachers who deduct points for handing an assignment in late. This doesn't show a student their level of understanding--it pushes them to act like the teachers version of the "perfect student". Grading is biased, while written feedback is not. The foundation is that everyone should improve upon their weaknesses.
Overall, replacing grades with written feedback would move the goalpost of most students from getting a high grade to wanting to improve their skills. They know their next step, and it won't be seen as a "good" or "bad" result. Moreover, written feedback mitigates the day old issue of grade bias, and stops students from feeling that they have to change themselves first to "get a good grade".
11:28 AM