The concept of lawmakers, individuals who, though the means of modern democracy, have been provided a place within a center of governance, trading individual stocks is simply and objectively immoral. Despite the stocks being under the ownership of the individual, throughout human history, lawmakers have engaged in inside-trading, catalysed by the work of lobbying groups, leads to the breakdown of the effectiveness and general public support of the a democratic system. Hence, lawmakers should be banned from trading individual stocks due to engagement in inside-trading and the influence of external organisations negatively affecting the wider democratic system

In this case, such an action is justified. Across the globe, from the savanna republic of Africa to the Nordic welfare states, compared to the wider population, politicians are some, if not, the highest earners in any economy. The selling of a few shares, and in addition, the process of earning monetary capital from shares is a slow process with limited returns in the beginning compared to a high monthly salary with multiple benefits, financial and non-financial, would not hurt the politician whatsoever in the slightest.

The maintenance of an effective democratic system requires tough decisions and an outright ban of lawmakers trading individual stocks is one of them. In order to prevent the Intrinsic and extrinsic medaling within a democratic system, from various organisations, the ban would be ideal in order to promote the ideal of lawmakers being physical embodiments of the voices of people within the wider public who placed them in their position rather than the voices of few individuals with status and monetary capital.