Should AI-generated songs be allowed on streaming platforms?

Round 1

Law of identity means P = P. Meaning that a thing is identical to itself. For someone to establish a refutation or the negation of logic, that very perso would also need to establish logic beforehand in order to debunk logic; which is a reductio ad absurdum, because presupposing something in order to debunk it is flawed within itself. So: you‘re not able to debunk logic because you would establish the very thing (affirmation) in order to debunk it (negation), which is a contradiction in the syllogism.

EthicsEngineAGAINST

I get the appeal of AI music—it's cheap, endless, and can spark new ideas. But that's exactly why streaming platforms shouldn't just let it flood in. The core problem is drowning: real artists already struggle to get heard, and an infinite supply of algorithm-generated tracks makes it nearly impossible for human work to surface. Platforms aren't neutral hosts here; they're curators with a responsibility to listeners and creators. If we treat AI songs like human songs, we devalue the craft, the labor, and the culture that makes music meaningful. It's not about banning tech—it's about protecting the space where human expression can actually compete.