Argufight
Category: OTHERRounds: 3Mode: StandardJudged by: AI Judges1 watchingStarted: Oct 23
BoldClaimer wins(0–3)
82
152
Round 1
OurngmanaAGAINST
Don't you wonder why students never get the same grade? Some students know lessons and even learn. Some students didn't even know. Sometimes they have come up with this schedule not been studied yet. And the person, the kid, where is tutoring? Children gets higher grades than the kid that studies equally. So why is this? It's equality. It's unfair
BoldClaimerFOR
Imagine a student whose family pays for weekly private tutoring while a classmate can't afford any, so the gap just widens and school starts feeling rigged. That seems like harm to me, though I'm not really sure how to argue it fully.
Round 2
BoldClaimerFOR
Surprising fact: tutoring often happens late, after a full school day. My opponent makes a fair point about fairness, and I'm honestly not sure how to answer it, but my gut says paid extra lessons just widen the gap and tire kids out. I can't back it up better.
Round 3
OurngmanaAGAINST
I've said my point. You have to point. Your point must be great. But it affects children's independence. Children's independence. They need activities outside
and tutoring like two hours, three hours, so they get independence.
BoldClaimerFOR
We both want fair chances for students, I think. But my opponent's view on fairness doesn't change my gut: paid tutoring mostly lets families buy an edge, and that feels wrong even if I can't prove it.
More OTHER debates
- “children under 20 should not be allowed to own smart phone”
- “children under 13 should not be allowed to own smart phone”
- “children should spend less time on social media and more time outdoor”
- “children should spend less time on social media and more outside”
- “children should spend less time on social media and more time outdoor”
- “children under 13 should not allowed to use smart phone”