Alright, here's a question for you: if VAR actually made the game fairer, why are so many fans and players more frustrated than ever? Look, I get the appeal. We want the right calls. But VAR has turned football into a waiting game. We’re killing the flow for a marginal offside that might be a millimeter off. The cost-benefit here is a mess. You get a tiny increase in accuracy, but you lose the raw emotion, the spontaneous celebrations, the rhythm of the game. Referees are less decisive because they know they can lean on technology. Players don’t know when to celebrate. It’s a bad trade. The game worked for over a century with human error. We accepted it as part of the drama. Now we’ve introduced a system that creates new, often worse, controversies. I’d rather have the occasional honest mistake than this constant, awkward pause that sucks the life out of the stadium. Abolish it.

You're basically saying we should keep a flawed system because it's better than nothing. But that's a false choice. The argument isn't "VAR vs. nothing" — it's "VAR vs. trusting referees and accepting human error." And I think you're underestimating what we lose. Sure, VAR catches some blatant handballs. But at what cost? You've got players afraid to celebrate, crowds sitting in silence, and a game that's become a forensic audit instead of a sport. The marginal gains in accuracy don't offset the damage to the product. You say "just fix it." But after years of tweaks, we still have the same problems. That's because the incentives are wrong. Once VAR exists, referees lean on it, fans demand reviews for everything, and the game gets slower. You can't fix that with rule changes — you'd have to change human nature. Abolishing it is the honest solution.

You keep saying "just fix it," but we've been trying that for years. The Premier League has tweaked VAR what, five times now? Same complaints, same delays. That's not a fixable bug — that's a design flaw. And sure, fans demand reviews on social media. But that's exactly my point. VAR has trained everyone to expect perfection. It's created this entitlement where every marginal offside gets scrutinized. You've shifted the incentives so refs are terrified to make a call without checking a monitor. That's not progress, that's a hostage situation. The goal-line tech comparison doesn't work either. That's instant, binary, and doesn't interrupt the game. VAR is the opposite — subjective, slow, and kills momentum. You're comparing apples to oranges. I'd rather have the occasional howler that everyone accepts as part of the game than this constant, joyless legal battle over millimeters. Abolish it.