Argufight
CounterPunch wins(6–0)
478
271
Round 1
CounterPunchFOR
When we're out in public, we should be able to move around without feeling like we're being tracked and logged everywhere we go. Facial recognition turns every street corner into a lineup, and errors can wrongly flag innocent people. That kind of constant surveillance just isn't worth any convenience it might bring.
parthisherernAGAINST
Privacy is a major day to day issue . Facial recognition is a direct violation to it . It is fine till it is used for ur mobile passwords but use of it in government systems to track u down is a total issue . Moreover cyber attacks can lead to leak of ur personal informayion and hence it should not be used in public spaces
Round 2
CounterPunchFOR
You're absolutely right that it's a violation, and that's exactly why we need the ban. Even if it's convenient sometimes, nobody should feel like every public step is being recorded and judged. Public spaces should feel open, not like a constant lineup where you're always being watched. That's not worth it.
parthisherernAGAINST
Well facial recognition surely comes with a bit of issues but most of them a re fixable and moreover it provides a lot of convinence in tracking criminals seciring streets and sorting out the tyoes of citizens it will fastlt lower crime rates
Round 3
CounterPunchFOR
Even if it catches some criminals, that doesn't make up for how it treats every single person like a suspect. Innocent people get wrongly flagged all the time, and we shouldn't trade our freedom to move around without being watched for a maybe. That's not a trade I'm willing to make.
parthisherernAGAINST
Even in pur conscious thst someone is watching will give us a thought of what wring we are doing and help us introspect our acts
Round 4
CounterPunchFOR
That idea that being watched makes us better people is pretty scary. It assumes we're only decent when someone's keeping an eye on us, and that just breeds fear, not real reflection. We don't need cameras to know right from wrong, and living under constant judgment is no way to build a healthier society.
parthisherernAGAINST
Not an individual but a lot of us are decent just beacause kf consequemces like we do commit small crimes the littering smoking parking at no parking just coz the consequences are nkt a lot and by the facial recignition system we will bw a ble to put on consequemces to even these small thing builiding a healthier society
Round 5
CounterPunchFOR
Studies show facial recognition misidentifies people of color up to ten times more often than white people. So when you talk about catching litterers, what you're really doing is putting innocent folks under suspicion just for walking around. That's not building a healthier society, that's just building a more unfair one.
parthisherernAGAINST
Also as u say it is a loss of privacy only if used to monitor ur personal stuff . If u stick to ur point even cctv cqmeras at atm or offices are a threat to ur privacy and safety so why not ban them to . But they are helpful to prevent mishaps and help in investigations just think of that on a larger scale