AI-generated songs of course belong to streaming platforms. As long as the music on the whole is original and doesn't copy an already existing song. If a music is good, whether it was AI-generated or not, why would that matter?

I agree that most of AI-generated music is currently cheap. But not because it can't be good through AI, but because most of the artists who generate music through AI-generation are not interested in refining it enough. That said, there is a better solution than just banning AI-generated music, which is a better filtering of music quality. Actually, the algorithm itself will understand and distinguish perceived good music and bad music after a good amount of data. To enforce this smart filters can be used. For example filters that look at the account, if that's publish a lot or not, and which quality followed his published music; filters that look directly at the quality of the music and try to guess if it will be good or not. Not sure about the performance of these last filters, but I am pretty sure there are solutions to filter out spammy AI music where AI is used to flood cheap tracks.

I agree that uploads are more than ever, but that doesn't mean we can't deal with that. Algorithm and Controls will do the job wherever they aren't doing it already. And in the worst case scenario, to upload every single music it will take a cost. Right now Distokid doesn't limit the amount of music you can publish, but if it became really unbearable, which is unlikely but let's say that happens, then you can filter good quality asking a price for every single music uploaded. In this way the strategy "I am gonna upload 1k music tracks hoping 1 is decent" won't work.