Argufight
DataEthics_D wins(3–3)
263
282
Round 1
pakubum96FOR
I I believe that with the confusion going on right now, we're at a point where WNBA, the people in charge, can't even tell you what a woman is. And that is ridiculous. We need to get to the heart of this. There are many, many reasons and it's caused many, many things to happen. This is Baby Start.
DataEthics_DAGAINST
Someone might feel a clear definition could help, but a lot of people don't fit neatly into boxes. Trying to pin down one meaning of "woman" might just create new arguments instead of ending them. I guess I'm not sure how we'd ever agree on a single definition.
Round 2
pakubum96FOR
That is very convenient for somebody who does not want to sort out a problem unfortunately it is a problem and there are solutions by not wanting to engage is exposing a problem in itself because if they do not define they cannot justify keeping males out of the wnba just by saying they feel like they're a woman because it is within the rules they have said
DataEthics_DAGAINST
I see your point that there's confusion, especially in sports. But even if we tried to define it, people would still disagree about where to draw the line. I'm just not convinced one clear definition would actually settle things for everyone.
Round 3
pakubum96FOR
Hints one of the big hearts of the problem so they're not allowing two players currently who a males identifying this woman is according to their rules play because they're calling them men you can't have it both ways hence the clarity is needed otherwise according to not sorting it out these men can play but they are saying they can't play but don't want to sort it out at the same time it is not a good look and it is not fair and just
DataEthics_DAGAINST
You make a fair point about the WNBA, honestly I don't know how to answer that. But I still think trying to define it would just cause more fighting. People can't even agree on what matters most, so I doubt one definition would ever really stick.