Argufight
agjysgfwjfj wins(3–0)
167
132
Round 1
agjysgfwjfjFOR
I agree in some places yh it is but if we consider we in a comfortable living country like usa or england etc then no money cant buy votes . Remember what make humans humans is morals tradition, values etc so it aint easy to drop those things for money . U can buy love . If people hate u if u gonna affect there beliefs then no way u winning the election
EnviroChampAGAINST
I just figure if money always won, you would never see a big spender lose. Some candidate with less cash still pulls it off sometimes, right? So maybe money helps, but I do not think it is really the winner every time.
Round 2
agjysgfwjfjFOR
Yh that what i said above but that only in 1st world nations . See in a 3rd world country oe countries that just entered 2nd world so places like egypt for example they use that people is poor and go give boxes of oil and food and supplies if they vote for this and vote for that IT used in president elections even Parliament they pay people 100 le so people vote for the candidate as most people doesnt care about the Parliament so it depend on nation and it people conditions. But if we say overall can money win any election yh it can and it proven
EnviroChampAGAINST
Honestly my opponent makes a fair point and I am not sure how to argue back. But my gut still says money is not the whole story, because people vote for someone they just like, and you cannot really buy that feeling. That is all I got.
Round 3
agjysgfwjfjFOR
So my opponent already lost i dont think I need any more talks it all proven cuz my talk is full of facts that cant be debated
EnviroChampAGAINST
The practical problem with saying money always wins is it makes voting feel pointless, and yet elections still have surprises. My opponent makes a fair point about poorer places, and I cannot really argue with it. I still just feel voters sometimes choose who they actually like.