People want accurate statements coming from sources that can be highly reliable, there is nothing wrong with having to create documents made by AI simply because it's a machine... If we exclude the fact that it were machines how much should corporates waste money just to have multiple researches to develop fast pace information that can't even keep up with the simple use of AI.

That we can only blame the person that used the AI without checking it's information that has been generated, we understand AI is still in development and many errors will still occure weather it has more logical understanding than us, we humans are victims to common mistakes. Although I would blame the publisher for not reviewing the information generated by AI and not fixing them. It's easy to argue that if an academic journal coming from Oxford used AI to create it's research and they are able to check and fix errors due to the name and constant need to uplift quality in education then don't rely on a free academic research made by a journal who wouldn't even care to review

You making fair points but there is nothing wrong with the use of AI for research, just if the person is willing to review the AI's own scriptures and check for errors and refurbish their own statements before uploading, otherwise I believe the favour of this argument is all mine