I think that if people want to listen to AI Slop, then they should be allowed to listen to AI Slop. It is a free country after all. If the problem is more about people's music getting stolen from AI music producers, then I can see an argument in that direction. But I also think that that's exactly the kind of music that normal people want to listen to. So I think that an outright ban would be both extreme and impractical and require more monitoring than we are practically able to enforce. It's actually very hard to definitively verify whether or not a song was produced by an AI or a human. So you might potentially run the risk of accidentally banning a human because you misdetected that it was an AI. And usually it's other AIs that are the ones that end up banning the AIs. So you run a risk of furthering the proliferation of AI domination.

Instead of forcing a ban, I think a more practical thing to do would be to try to sort between human producers and AI producers in a stipulative fashion where we're not outright declaring that an artist is human or AI, but we're trying to sort of group them together based on whether or not the music seems human produced or AI produced. And this allows people to listen to the music that they want to listen to just by toggling some filters on the website rather than having to guess for themselves. So I think a middle solution can be appropriate. I just think it's kind of impractical to try to do a universal ban on all AI music across all music streaming platforms.

Like I said, the problem that you're pointing out can be resolved by having some filtering mechanism that allows you to get a good heuristic for whether or not the music you're listening to was made by a real human or by an AI. Some sort of verification system would be in order, and I think that it would get rid of the problem quite efficiently without needing a complete ban on all AI music, which runs a few risks that would be undesirable.