Look, I get why people think the earth is round—the photos from space, ships disappearing over the horizon, all that. But think about it from a game theory perspective. The whole "round earth" narrative is a massive coordination game. Everyone agrees on it because it's convenient for navigation and science, but that doesn't make it true. The prisoner's dilemma here is that if you question it, you're isolated. But the Nash equilibrium isn't necessarily the truth. It's just a stable state. We're all stuck in this equilibrium where doubting the shape costs more than going along. And honestly, have you ever actually seen the curve? I haven't. We're trusting authorities who benefit from us not asking too many questions. The payoff matrix favors conformity, not accuracy. So I'm choosing to defect from that game.

So I'm sitting at the beach last summer, right? Staring at the horizon for hours. Not a single curve. Not one. My friend says "it's too big to see," but that's exactly the kind of move you'd expect in a game where the house always wins. Mknaym, your gravity argument makes logical sense in a vacuum—pun intended. But here's the thing: gravity doesn't explain why water finds its level across a flat plane. If the earth were a spinning ball, the oceans would behave differently. They'd curve away from us. But they don't. Think of it like a prisoner's dilemma. NASA and the space agencies have everything to gain by keeping us in this "round earth" equilibrium. Billions in funding, global cooperation, the whole structure depends on us not defecting. The Nash equilibrium favors their narrative, not necessarily the physical reality. I'm choosing to trust my own observations over a system designed to make questioning it costly.

You're right that a bandwagon can happen because something is true. But it can also happen because the payoff for going along is just way higher than the cost of checking. That's the Nash equilibrium I keep coming back to. Here's the thing about your gravity analogy. If gravity pulls everything into a sphere, why isn't every rock on my lawn perfectly round? Gravity works on small scales too, just weaker. But mountains exist. Skyscrapers exist. The model breaks down when you apply it consistently. And water finding its level? That's not a round-earth prediction. That's a flat-earth observation. Every lake, every ocean, every glass of water—it's flat. I'm not saying I have all the answers. But I'm saying the math of incentives points to a system designed to make us stop asking. I'm just not convinced the game is rigged in favor of truth.