The question regards lawmakers trading individual stocks should be illegal and I am forced to be for it. And I agree with it, so actually I'm not forced to be for it. I am actually for it. Lawmakers, politicians have much more information than the general public has. Like let's say I can read a newspaper about a company called Palantir. The speaker is... And then I can make a basic assumption. And then I am forced to make a decision about whether or not I should invest in that company. However, lawmakers, they don't speculate. They know. What was her name? Marjorie Taylor Greene. She made an agreement with Palantir to use it to help with ICE or Israel, I believe. And then some reads before it was official that Palantir would be part of the US government she invested into Palantir And then suddenly the price of it increased once the investors knew that Palantir would have more business. Therefore, the point of the stock market should be about speculation. Insider trading is illegal because at that point we are not speculating. We know. And that's illegal. That's why the people who invest in their own company they work for, they often can only invest one month, two months before the results come up. To prevent insider trading, I think lawmakers have access to insider information, information that the general public don't have. That's not on the newspaper. Therefore, I am for that lawmakers trading individual stocks should be illegal.

The point you just made really doesn't make sense. The other side seems to assume lawmakers can't tell public duty from their own portfolio. But I just gave you an example that Marjorie Taylor Greene she had insider knowledge about certain companies. If an average person gets insider information it would be called cheating. Therefore I think politicians are cheating in the stock market.

Well, this proposal of banning the politicians from accessing the stock market has happened quite a few times in the US with lawmakers like Josh Hawley Tave a discussion about a group of people trying to answer their question. Tthe speaker is made by an expert to answer their question. Tthe speaker is a kind of question. It's like, let's say there are five construction workers and then they are just construction workers in general and then the majority of them have insider knowledge about the stock market. Then there will be a proposal of a law saying should the stock market be banned from construction workers because it's an issue. Obviously, since the proposal of the law has come up quite a few times, even recently, we know that lawmakers are misbehaving in the stock market. Not just passively putting their money into investment savings, but actually inside knowledge, which in itself is illegal.