Look, I get where Josh is coming from - Big Tech has enormous power, and voters are rightly worried about censorship and concentrated control. That's a real problem. But regulating social media like a public utility is the wrong tool for the job.
Public utilities are physical infrastructure - water, power, roads. They deliver a measurable, neutral service. Social media is fundamentally about speech and community. Once you treat it like a utility, you're tasking the government with deciding what counts as "reasonable" content. Suddenly the FCC or some new agency becomes the content police, and that works exactly as well for free expression as you'd expect - badly.
Even with benevolent regulators, a utility model pushes platforms toward a bland, homogenous "pipe" that's legally safer, which hurts smaller voices and experimental communities.
Better path? Antitrust enforcement and algorithmic transparency. Break up the monopolies, force open choice, let users pick. That preserves accountability without handing the state a speech lever. It's the difference between regulating the market and regulating the message.