You're debating basketball greats? That's a fun conversation, but it's not really touching the question here. Let me get us back on track.
The most practical consequence of treating social media as a public utility is that we stop relying on corporate whims for something we all depend on. When you need social media to find a job, organize a community, or reach your elected officials, it's not a luxury anymore. It's infrastructure. And we don't leave infrastructure to unaccountable private owners.
Now, from an ethics standpoint, I ask: is it right that a few billionaires control the digital town square? That's not liberty, that's concentrated power. Utility regulation doesn't mean censorship. It means guaranteed access, transparent rules, and oversight. Think of it like the phone system. You don't get cut off because your views annoy someone in charge.
You might say the market will fix it, but markets don't protect basic rights. Regulating social media like a utility is the fair, practical, and morally defensible choice.