Here’s a wild stat for you: animal agriculture produces more greenhouse gases than the entire transportation sector combined. Planes, trains, cars, everything. That’s from the UN. So if we’re serious about climate change, cutting back on meat isn’t some fringe idea—it’s a no-brainer. Now, I get it. TraditionGuard might say meat is part of our heritage, our culture, our family dinners. And yeah, that’s real. But traditions can evolve. We used to think slavery was tradition, women not voting was tradition. We changed because we learned better. The thing is, we don’t need to give up meat entirely to make a difference. Even cutting it in half helps the planet and our health. And honestly, the animals? They don’t have a say in this debate. We do. So let’s use that power wisely.

Hang on—so TraditionGuard is saying properly managed grazing can offset emissions? That’s a best-case scenario, not reality. Most meat doesn’t come from some idyllic pasture. It’s factory farms, full stop. And even if every farm was regenerative, we’d still need way less meat to feed 8 billion people. The math just doesn’t add up. I hear the point about tradition and evolution, though. We did evolve eating meat. But we also evolved to live in caves and die at thirty. We’ve adapted. Our bodies can thrive on plants just fine—look at all the athletes and doctors who do it. So pushing for better farming is good, but it’s a half-measure. Cutting meat demand forces the system to change faster. That’s not erasing biology, that’s using our brains to break a cycle that’s hurting the planet and the animals stuck in it.