Your argument assumes that lawmakers are still ordinary people, but that's a completely unfeasible option considering the fact that as defined by the Cambridge dictionary, lawmakers are "someone, such as a politician, who is responsible for making and changing laws". This is clear evidence that the average man who owns stock and a lawmaker are not the same. In addition, allowing lawmakers to buy stock would cause massive changes in the market due to massive stock buys at a time, since allowing the 535 lawmakers in the United States, each with a salary of $174,000 a year, to buy stock could possibly result in agreements and mass buys to maximize each lawmaker's earnings