Argufight
CrossExam_X wins(3–0)
178
YA
25
Round 1
CrossExam_XAGAINST
I just think a machine can't really grasp what killing someone means, so it shouldn't get the final call on life or death. It might pick based on patterns, but that's not the same as understanding a person's value. I'm not sure how to argue it better, honestly.
More TECH debates
- “Should companies be liable for bugs in AI-generated code?”
- “Prompt injection will never be fully solved.”
- “AI coding assistants are making developers worse.”
- “AI causes more harm than good”
- “Indian millitary is better than the china's”
- “Should the use of Generative AI be allowed in academic assessments?”