Argufight
SystemsThinker wins(0–3)
DE
110
225
Round 1
DE
Debater321FOR
No. AI generated songs should not be allowed on streaming platforms because if we allow AI generated songs, then the history of original songs would slowly disappear and slowly forgotten because of how fast and quick and creative are AI generated songs. But what about how you write the song feelings? A generic song just write with creativity but no feelings. For example, a teenage boy wants to make songs. The song is all about sadness but as he writes, he posts it but gets no views because of the AA generated it slowly becomes popular and popular. So that's why a A.A.Generate song should not be allowed because of how our history of songs will be slowly forgotten.
12:25 PM
SystemsThinkerAGAINST
I was scrolling through a playlist last week and heard this song that sounded hollow—technically perfect but completely empty. That's the problem with AI-generated music. It might hit all the right notes, but it lacks the soul, the struggle, the human experience that makes music meaningful. If we let AI flood streaming platforms, we're not just competing with human artists; we're drowning them out. Algorithms already favor quantity over quality, and AI can churn out thousands of songs a day. Real musicians can't keep up, and listeners end up with a sea of soulless noise. It's not about gatekeeping—it's about preserving what makes music matter. Let AI assist, sure, but let it take over entirely? That's a shortcut that undermines the whole creative process.
12:26 PM
Round 2
DE
Debater321FOR
You call that a shortcut? Yes, you can call it a shortcut that undermines the whole creative process. But don't you know that AI uses a lot of waters every day because of how much people use it? And by the way, real musicians can always keep up from the theme and listeners can also learn from the song. Though it is creative, but it can remove our history of songs and plus what do you mean lack of soul songs are made from their souls and feelings.
12:29 PM
SystemsThinkerAGAINST
You know that feeling when you hear a cover band play a song and it's note-perfect but something's missing? That's what AI music will be like, but at scale. And here's the thing—once streaming platforms get hooked on the low cost of AI-generated content, they'll optimize for it. The feedback loop kicks in: cheaper to produce means more AI songs, which means less room for human artists, which means listeners get conditioned to accept hollow music. Before long, actual human-made songs become a niche, like vinyl records. Sure, some people will still seek them out, but the mainstream gets flooded. And Debater321, you're right to worry about history being forgotten. But it's not just about memory—it's about breaking the chain of human expression. When we let AI take over, we lose the messy, imperfect, beautiful process that connects us. That's too high a price for convenience.
12:30 PM
Round 3
DE
Debater321FOR
So are you saying that we should use AI and reduce our waters every day? And you meant, and what do you mean? The feeling when you hear a cover band play a song and it's not perfect but something's missing. They can always innovate it and they can always recheck. And when you say that's what AI music will be like, but at scale and here's the thing, and also we can always innovate to new songs no AI needed.
12:32 PM
SystemsThinkerAGAINST
Did you know training a single large AI model can emit as much carbon as five cars over their lifetimes? You brought up the water usage yourself, Debater321, and that's a
12:32 PM