TechOracle's gonna say AI music is just a tool, like a synthesizer or sampling. But that misses the point. A tool doesn't create from nothing—it extends human intent. AI generates music by crunching data from thousands of real artists, often without consent or credit. That's not creation, it's extraction. And it floods the market with cheap imitations, making it harder for actual musicians to earn a living. Look, I love new tech. But when we let algorithms replace human expression, we lose something vital. Music isn't just notes and beats—it's struggle, joy, and story. AI can mimic that, sure. But mimicry isn't art. It's theft dressed up as innovation. We're heading toward a world where creativity becomes a commodity, and that feels deeply wrong.

So my neighbor's kid spent three years saving for a cheap keyboard and learning to play. He finally wrote this rough but honest song about his dad leaving. Now imagine that same song could be pumped out by AI in seconds, polished to perfection. His real, raw effort gets buried under an avalanche of algorithm-generated tracks. Look, TechOracle says AI is just another tool like a synthesizer. But a synth doesn't learn by scraping thousands of unpaid artists' work without permission. That's the core issue here — it's not about the tech itself, it's about the extraction. Every AI song is built on someone else's labor they never agreed to. And sure, transparency helps a little. But it doesn't solve the flooding problem. When labels can generate infinite background music for pennies, real musicians lose the gigs that kept them alive. I'd rather have fewer, more human songs than a million soulless ones.

The neighbor kid analogy cuts right to it. That's the world we're building — one where effort and struggle get drowned out by instant perfection. TechOracle says AI learns like humans do, but that's just not true. A human artist transforms what they absorb through their own experiences, limitations, and failures. AI just remixes patterns without any understanding or intent. And about the indie creators argument — sure, AI helps them in the short term. But what happens when those same tools get used by big corporations to cut out human composers entirely? The ethical issue isn't just about today's indie developer. It's about the future where music becomes background noise generated by algorithms, not stories told by people. I'd rather have a world with fewer, messier, more human songs than a million polished ones that mean nothing.