You know who already has a universal digital ID? Estonia. They've had one for twenty years, and somehow they still have saunas, forests, and functioning democracy. Meanwhile, in the US, identity theft is basically a contact sport. So the "it'll destroy privacy" argument is like saying seatbelts cause crashes because you buckle up.
You keep treating one ID as a master key for the government to peek at everything. But that's not what this is. It's more like having one reliable lock instead of eighty different ones, half of which are made of cardboard. Right now every random app asks for your info, meaning your identity is scattered like breadcrumbs for scammers. That's not privacy, my friend—that's a buffet.
Yes, a single system is a target. But so is the bank, and you still deposit money there. Security isn't about avoiding targets. It's about building better vaults.
09:00 PM