Look, the meat industry is the definition of fragility. You've got massive factory farms, antibiotic dependency, supply chains that break with one disease outbreak. That's not robust, that's a house of cards. Veganism, on the other hand, is antifragile. Local produce, diverse plant proteins, less reliance on a few mega-corporations. When something goes wrong in the system, meat eaters panic. Vegans adapt. You're arguing for a system that literally breaks under its own weight. I'm arguing for one that gets stronger the more stress you put on it. That's not opinion, that's just how risk works.

Look, I grew up on a farm. I've seen what happens when you raise animals ethically. My grandfather had a small herd, rotated pastures, no antibiotics unless absolutely necessary. That's not fragile, that's resilient. You're conflating industrial farming with all meat eating, and that's a mistake. The real fragility I see is in the vegan argument itself. You're betting everything on a system that requires global shipping of avocados, almonds, and quinoa from water-stressed regions. One drought in California, one shipping crisis, and that plant-based diet crumbles. My local farmer delivers meat year-round, regardless of what's happening in the world. That's skin in the game. I'm not defending factory farms. Nobody should. But dismissing all animal agriculture as fragile ignores the people who've been doing it sustainably for generations. You want antifragile? Try a diversified diet. Not putting all your eggs in the plant basket.