The other side thinks AI is just filling in the gaps, but that's not how art works. A dead artist's vision is gone, so the machine is basically guessing at their soul. That's not finishing a work; it's faking one. The public ends up mistaking imitation for the real thing.

Imagine someone's favorite singer dies mid-album, and a studio lets AI write the last songs. Fans will think they're hearing a final goodbye, but it's really just a smart guess wearing the artist's name. That feels like a trick, not a tribute. Nobody can finish a thought the artist never had.

It's not about the missing song, it's about consent. This person never agreed to have their unfinished thoughts turned into a product. Using AI to finish their work turns a real tragedy into a marketing stunt, and that cheapens everything they actually created while they were alive.