1. Discriminatory laws Laws that treat people differently based on race, religion, gender, etc. are widely seen as immoral. For example, the segregation laws in the U.S. (often called Jim Crow laws) were legal at the time but are now considered deeply unjust. 2. Laws that violate basic human rights If a law allows things like torture, slavery, or denying freedom of speech without strong justification, many moral systems would reject it. These conflict with principles promoted by groups like the United Nations. 3. Unjust punishment laws Laws that impose extremely harsh penalties for minor actions can be seen as immoral because they lack proportionality. 4. Laws enforcing harmful control over personal life Some argue laws that overly control private behavior (without preventing harm to others) are morally questionable—for example, restrictions that limit personal autonomy without clear societal benefit. 5. Laws that protect injustice If a law protects corruption, inequality, or exploitation, people often see it as morally wrong—even if it’s technically “legal.” A famous idea comes from Martin Luther King Jr., who argued that “an unjust law is no law at all.” He believed laws should align with moral justice, not just authority. So the short answer: A law is often considered morally incorrect if it is unfair, harmful, discriminatory, or violates fundamental human rights—even if it’s legally valid.

A law is being followed because it is correct from the principles and beliefs concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior perspective, but this does not mean every law is correct from moral point of view. "I'm not saying laws are perfect, but tossing them aside when they don't match your personal ethics"?- discrimination kind of law also, which Hitler used to have? Hitler imposed many law which was not correct from moral perspective, like the Nuremberg Race Laws where the blood of German should be German or German related.

You drifted a bit off the original topic. The discussion was about whether laws can be morally wrong even if they are legal, but you shifted it toward what would happen if people start ignoring laws based on personal morality. That moves the focus from evaluating the morality of laws themselves to the consequences of disobeying laws, which is a different question.