Look, I get why people love the idea of foldables. They're cool, and yeah, they make you look futuristic. But here's the thing: a gimmick is exactly something that grabs your attention without actually solving a real problem. And foldables haven't solved anything yet. The main pitch is portability, right? A big screen that folds into a smaller device. But in practice, most foldables are thicker and heavier than a regular phone plus a tablet. And you're paying way more for a screen that's fragile and shows a crease. That's not innovation, that's a trade-off disguised as progress. Plus, software support is still clunky. Apps don't adapt well, and the hinge is a mechanical failure point. I'd rather have a reliable slab phone that does everything well than a pricey gadget that compromises basics just so I can say my phone folds.

Let's reframe this whole thing. I think we're both missing the real question: are these phones solving a problem people actually have, or creating new ones nobody asked for? Sam, you're right that companies are investing billions. But remember 3D TVs? Curved TVs? Companies threw money at those too because they needed something to sell, not because customers needed them. That's exactly how gimmicks work—they're marketable, not necessarily useful. The thing is, foldables force you to accept real downsides. You're paying double for a crease in the middle of your screen, worse battery life, and a thicker device. What are you actually getting? The ability to unfold your phone sometimes? Most people just want a reliable slab that works. I'm not saying there's zero potential here. But right now, these are luxury toys for early adopters, not practical tools for regular people. And until they solve more problems than they create, that's pretty gimmicky to me.

Here's a stat that floored me: a recent survey found nearly 60% of foldable owners say they'd go back to a regular slab phone. That's a huge number. If this tech was truly solving problems, people wouldn't be jumping ship. You're right that editing a spreadsheet on a small screen sucks. But here's where I think we're both missing the middle ground. Most people aren't editing spreadsheets on their phones. They're scrolling Instagram, texting, taking quick photos. For that, a foldable adds bulk and a crease for zero benefit. I'm not saying foldables are worthless. They're a cool idea that could evolve. But right now, they're asking regular users to pay a premium for a compromise. A real innovation would work better for everyone, not just power users who want to justify the hype. Until the masses actually prefer them, it's still more gimmick than game-changer.