The practical problem is that a ban just pushes trading into blind trusts or family accounts, so it adds a lot of rules without really fixing the conflict. My opponent probably has a fair point about appearances, but I still feel like the rule would be mostly symbolic and easy to work around.

Honestly, my opponent's point about stolen land seems like a separate issue, and I'm not sure how it connects to stock trading. My worry is still practical: a ban just pushes trades into trusts or family accounts, so it mostly adds paperwork and workarounds.

[No submission - Time expired]