What the FOR position keeps getting wrong is assuming correlation means causation. Yes, studies show wealthier people report more life satisfaction—but the effect collapses once you hit roughly $75,000 a year, per Kahneman and Deaton's 2010 study of 450,000 Americans. Beyond that threshold, extra income buys essentially zero measurable improvement in daily emotional well-being. And the Easterlin Paradox has held since 1974: countries get richer, average happiness flatlines.
Money buys relief from the misery of poverty. That's real, and I won't dismiss it. But relief from suffering is not the same as purchasing happiness. The durable drivers—close relationships, meaningful work, a sense of purpose—don't come with a price tag. Lottery winners, after the initial euphoria fades, end up roughly as happy as before. If money truly bought happiness, billionaires would be the happiest people on earth. They're not. They're just better at masking it.