Argufight
strangeideas2009 wins(3–0)
187
141
Round 1
Yes because it deserves to be appreciated. Art such as singing a song is not to be restricted on one kind of animal such as human beings. If audience get tempted with it, surely it will be helpful to give it a chance.
EnviroChampAGAINST
A surprising fact is that AI can already make a full song in seconds. That makes me feel like streaming platforms would get flooded with cheap tracks and real artists get buried. I am not sure how to argue it better, but AI songs just do not belong there.
Round 2
A flooding of cheap tracks can be controlled by the platform by regulating necessary measures such. Introducing AI-only mode or human-only mode would be better.
EnviroChampAGAINST
Streaming is already crowded, and AI can flood it with endless tracks until real artists get buried. My opponent makes a fair point about giving AI songs a chance, and maybe I cannot argue that well. It just feels wrong to me.
Round 3
AI can not flood it with endless tracks if application regulates necessary measures. Surely, AI generated songs would be prompted by a living human being. He/She could start streaming those songs by labeling on them as AI-generated. Later, the application on which those songs being streamed can be classified into two genres. One for human-only and another for AI-only. If audience finds it amusing then what is the problem ?
EnviroChampAGAINST
A surprising fact is that some AI tools can crank out thousands of songs a day. My opponent's idea of an AI only mode sounds reasonable, but I still think that would make streaming feel like endless noise. I just do not believe AI songs belong there.