Look, the opposition claims that extending right-to-repair to all electronics would somehow cripple innovation. But that's a false dichotomy. Let me break this down logically. First principle: If you own something, you should control its use. That's basic property rights. If I buy a toaster, a phone, or a medical device, it's mine. Period. The manufacturer doesn't get to dictate who fixes it or what parts I use. Second point: Planned obsolescence exists because companies know we can't repair their stuff. That's not innovation, that's artificial scarcity. We're throwing away tons of e-waste every year because a battery is glued in or a screen is impossible to replace. That's bad for consumers and worse for the planet. The argument that repair manuals would reveal trade secrets is weak. Most electronics aren't rocket science. A phone is a screen, a battery, and a logic board. Nothing proprietary there. Let people fix what they own.

Hang on - are we really comparing fixing a phone to performing surgery? That's a false equivalence. A scalpel in untrained hands is dangerous. A screwdriver in untrained hands strips a screw, maybe. Those aren't the same risk profile. Let me stick with the logic. If you own a device, you own it. Full stop. The manufacturer doesn't get to keep control after the sale. That's not how property works. You wouldn't accept a car dealer saying you can't change your own oil because it might void the "innovation." And the slippery slope about dumbing down design? That's not a given. We can have waterproof phones with replaceable batteries - it's already been done. Manufacturers choose not to because planned obsolescence is profitable. That's not engineering necessity, that's a business model. Bottom line: you can keep your thin phone and still let me fix mine. Those aren't mutually exclusive.

You keep bringing up worst-case scenarios, but that's not an argument against right-to-repair. It's an argument against people being reckless. By that logic, we shouldn't sell power tools because someone might cut their finger off. The solution isn't banning repair, it's better information and safety standards. You talk about lithium batteries like they're unexploded bombs. They're not. They're common, well-understood components. I can buy a replacement battery for my phone right now and install it safely if the manufacturer gave me access. Instead, they glue it in and refuse to sell the part. That's not protecting me, that's protecting their profit margin. Your nuclear reactor analogy is absurd. We're talking about consumer electronics, not weapons-grade material. Let's compare apples to apples. A smartphone is not a reactor. It's a computer with a battery. We let people change car batteries all the time without a license. Why the double standard here?