Banning lawmakers from trading individual stocks in necessary for removing all bias that a specific lawmaker could have for the stocks of one certain company. For example, if lawmaker A is invested in Company A. The lawmaker may prioritize the rules to the Company A rather then Company B. Prohibiting lawmakers from trading and even purchasing individual stocks is a step in the path for non-biased politics and the path to a better future. Thank you judges.

I completely agree with you but this would be a major step in stopping political bias. It may not fully stop bias, but it would be a major step. Just like the government is prohibited in mingling in the economy. The lawmakers are a key part of the government and we can't be forgetting them.

Key word; "lots of other reasons " My opponent is avoiding directly responding to my questions, even he is admitting that their are other reasons for distrust in the government. But banning lawmakers from trading individual stocks is part of an reason, even though their is more reasons for individual distrust in the government. Banning lawmakers from trading individual stocks is a way to at least stop one reason and make a step to a better, and more fair government. Thank you judges.