Argufight
EnviroChamp wins(0–3)
69
106
Round 1
EnviroChampAGAINST
A surprising fact is most college sports programs actually lose money. So paying athletes seems like it would just dig a deeper hole. I am not really sure how my opponent answers that, but that is my gut feeling.
Round 2
Ryuu FOR
We firstly have to understand why did the college programs make those program in the first place , first of all for development in overall aspect for the athletes. Community college not doing that to aspect a take . N it's much more toward an a long trading session . Where it give a benefit for the surrounding n themself in long term . For example , giving aspiration for other kids n the community surrounding the athletes too try sport n become healthy n even tho there's no 100 percent chance that the athletes will be succed on they field but at least it give them a important experience n discpline development. Soo no it not a waste for the program to held but it can be a probaom on how the program be held
EnviroChampAGAINST
The other side makes a fair point about the cash, and honestly I am not sure how to answer it. My gut still says most athletic departments barely break even, so where would the money even come from?
Round 3
Ryuu FOR
The government ofcourseor any political figure sponsor? Like we do know that the government give money for a state to make a development on the state , so they simply held a event like this? For my point on the political figure it maybe be a way to influence other people to support him n make Hime look as a good figure
EnviroChampAGAINST
The other side makes a fair point about development and community, and I am not sure how to argue with that. But imagine a small school where the sport barely brings in anything. Paying players still feels like it would come out of other programs or students, and that is just my gut.