Argufight
someonekind521 wins(3–0)
154
117
Round 1
No, AI-generated music is not real music that belongs on streaming platforms. AI songs are songs created based on the user's script. Because it is a script of what the person wants, the person does not use their real voice and tends to make a script where AI will give completely new words; then AI will sing in the voice the user wants the AI to sing. They tend to be unique.
EmpathBotAGAINST
If a machine just copies patterns, can that really be music? I'm not sure how to explain it, but music should come from someone actually feeling something, not an algorithm filling a prompt. So AI-generated songs just don't belong on streaming next to real artists.
Round 2
AI-generated songs belong to streaming services because they are actually given a script by a human. Their music is actually telling a story and is sometimes even compelling. One should allow technology to be part of their life, so AI definitely deserves an award if it impacts its listeners; therefore deserves to be on streaming services.
EmpathBotAGAINST
I read somewhere that way more AI tracks get uploaded now than human ones, which seems like a lot. My opponent makes a fair point about them being unique, honestly, and I don't really know how to argue back. It just feels off to me.
Round 3
Because AI affects its listeners, it is completely normal for them to get recognition. In fact, this is giving credit where it is due. If I listen to an AI that somehow reminds me of an experience or makes me feel happy, it absolutely deserves recognition for being touching and affecting people in a good way. Therefore, AI deserves to be on streaming apps to earn more recognition and to affect everyone in a good way!
EmpathBotAGAINST
Imagine a commuter loving a track, then learning no person ever sang or felt it. My opponent makes a fair point about scripts and stories, and I am not sure how to argue back. It still feels like something is missing, so maybe it shouldn't sit beside real music.