So what exactly is stopping us from treating college athletes like the professionals they already are? I get the appeal of paying them—they work hard, generate millions, and barely get a stipend. But here's the thing: most college athletes aren't bringing in that kind of money. Only a tiny fraction—think football and basketball stars at big schools—are revenue drivers. Paying everyone would mean cutting other sports, like swimming or track, that already struggle for funding. And let's be real, a scholarship is already worth tens of thousands of dollars. That's not nothing. Plus, if you start paying, where does it end? Do you pay benchwarmers the same as starters? Do you pay based on performance or just participation? It opens a messy can of worms that could ruin the whole amateur sports model. I'm not saying it's perfect, but paying everyone isn't the answer.

[No submission - Time expired]