Let's frame this properly: the question isn't whether a god is possible or comforting. It's whether there is sufficient evidence to believe one exists. My opponent will likely point to the universe, morality, or personal experience. But here's my yes or no question: if an all powerful, all loving god wanted everyone to know him, could he make that evidence unmistakable? Yes. Is the actual evidence unmistakable? No. So the honest verdict is atheism.

[No submission - Time expired]

Here's the practical consequence the other side keeps dodging: when you treat an unevidenced claim as certain knowledge, real decisions get made on it. Someone skips treatment. A parent opts out of a vaccine. So my question, and I want a yes or no: if this god existed and wanted us to know it, could he provide evidence no honest person could deny? Yes. Has anyone produced it? No. The other side went silent rather than answer. That silence is the verdict.