I clearly see your point. However, in my opinion, just because the companies created the algorithm doesn't mean that it was the fault in the company side. It is very\n Easy to put the fault on someone who can take the in charge. Who can take the charge of it? But when you're using some digital when you're working in a digital area, you have to be the one to be responsible for the things you have to be wise enough to look into things, hand know how to use it.

I see your argument. You make a fair point, but I believe that it is not the company.\n Is it is not you see, harm is not built it? People walking in the industries are not there to harm you to help you with your in making a life sort of easier, more effective time, saving. In fact, they provide free applications for that we are sources out there, but to have so many, we have to wisely choose. We have to the users have to be vigilant about what they're using. They have to look for word how things are they have to look for the pros and gones, they have to look for how the things work that's how human brain is it is always curious, and we have to know what we are using, we have to take the responsi.\n Bility harm has not built-in. They are not sitting there with the aim to harm the users. They're sitting there to make our life easier and make profit out of it for their living. And we have to, for our living, make the profit of the applications that are their own websites or on stores are available for us to use whether free or paid, we have to make out what is. Efficient for us what is made for us what we can handle for ourselves that does not do any harm.

agree but it is not how it looks like I'm not just asking you just be fair enough but I am asking them to investigate the platform the working on I'm trying to make them aware that see it is not that platform exists on internet. And it has no damages. It has no flaws. It cannot be possible be at the designed by the best programmers. Still, it will have some flaws. Why? Because it has been by a human. It is built by a human intelligence. And that is, not at all. Draw, the mistake is not something that is to be looked at. It is like you\n Have to see which where it is harmful, where it is not you have to see for your own good like they are seeing for their own, it's not like companies go out and announce that they have made this mistake. Sometimes they don't even some companies, which are not of that highly recognised, not much, highly recognised, they sometimes not are not even knowing what they are poding made my might have made Honestly, I don't know how to argue with that about payment. Yeah, if someone is making some mistake, then they have to take the responsibility. But if we are the one, the users are the 1 who are the victim they are, they are the ones being suffered. It is like the main thing. The main solution to the problem will be looking forward to. Because if they pointed for one company that one company might pay 2 companies might pay 3 companies might pay, but it won't be over time. Companies will find solution to delay it or to excuse themselves that it's not their fault, so If it is doing harm to us to the users, then we have to be vision. We have to be careful of what we use. We can always spread awareness, but it might not always result in what we are seeking for like, maybe payment. If we can take for instance, payment payment for the harm cost, it can be given for lake 2 / 2 companies, 3 companies. But after then, when it is like when it is very short to the company that the people are aware, they are investigating, if the codes will be solved either, there will be no flowers in that. Are they will find an excuse to this? They will find an excuse to avoid this to delay this or either. Do not even accept that it is the fault is at their end. So as users we want to be saved, we want not to be harmed. We want to be protected. So we have to be the ones looking forward to protect ourselves from whatever we want, but we have to do it ourselves.