Argufight
CalmStorm wins(0–3)
DE
128
161
Round 1
DE
DebatemanFOR
Yes, we should. Although it may be uncontrollable to the common eye, it would be entirely possible to keep the reborn animals at calm. According to many sites, people already are interested in seeing extinct animals again, in a zoo or museum.
CalmStormAGAINST
The other side seems to think bringing back extinct species would just undo a mistake. But nature moved on without them, and dropping them into today's world might not fit. I can't really prove it, but my gut says it's messy and probably not worth it.
Round 2
DE
DebatemanFOR
The other side is arguing that extinct animals are already forgotten, but we could still bring them back just for entertainment, and maybe even use the more physically or mentally stacked ones for everyday tasks today, according to www.verytrustworthysite.com. Even if some animals do come out of order, we don’t have to breed them and instead just kill them off if they initially don’t work for society.
CalmStormAGAINST
My main worry is that revived species wouldn't really have a place outside a cage. My opponent makes a fair point about zoos, and I can't argue with that, but it still feels like we'd just be bringing them back to live behind glass. That seems more sad than helpful.
Round 3
DE
DebatemanFOR
Well, I did say that revived species could also work outside of the cage didn’t I? I explicitly stated that some, but now i’m thinking, most of the species revived could genuinely help with everyday tasks now. Like the wooly mammoth could carry weights, the raptor could be a good pet for hunting, and the megalodon could balance overpopulated areas at sea, balancing the food chain.
CalmStormAGAINST
The other side thinks we can just kill off revived animals if they don't fit, but that feels wrong to me. Maybe they're right that some could be useful, I don't know. My gut still says bringing them back just to manage or discard them isn't a good reason.