Argufight
Category: OTHERRounds: 3Mode: StandardJudged by: AI Judges1 watchingStarted: Nov 6
ConstitutionC wins(0–3)
RO
45
CO
147
Round 1
RO
Rouxl_DaleeFOR
No Nut November could cause mental harm, physical harm and rumours (false ones) being spread.
participants could feel stress, guilt, pressure while participating.
if these people fail, they could be made fun of, which hurts them mentally (lets assume it does)
besides, NNN has no medical basis.
So the risk of getting prostate cancer, blood stream issues or DNA damage to sperm would not be rational to risk.
CO
ConstitutionCAGAINST
To me this is less about fairness and more about whether every job posting should be forced into one rigid format. A required salary number can feel like a fixed promise before anyone even talks about experience or fit, and that seems a bit backwards. I'm not sure, but leaving it flexible feels safer.
Round 2
CO
ConstitutionCAGAINST
Doesn't forcing a salary number into every ad lock things down before anyone knows the job? My opponent makes a fair point about fairness, and I'm honestly not sure how to argue back, but my gut still says some flexibility is safer than one rigid promise.
Round 3
CO
ConstitutionCAGAINST
A required salary in every ad still feels like too much of a rigid rule to me. My opponent seems to have drifted to a different topic, so I'm not sure how to answer that, but my gut says some flexibility is safer than forcing one number upfront.
More OTHER debates
- “participating in No Nut November is rather irrational if you take it seriously and do it for years”
- “No Nut November is hazardous if you participate in it every year.”
- “No Nut November, the trend, could cause mental harm, physical harm and false rumours being spread and is not worth taking the risks of ''winning'' this challange.”
- “No Nut November and Destroy Dick December are hazardous trends which are also less beneficial than they are.”
- “¿Las relaciones virtuales se pueden denominar "Auténticas" al igual que una relación presencial?”
- “Space tourism is an insult to a warming planet”