So the reason I think that Charlie Kirk stood up for child torture is because I think he stood up for banning abortions in any case. He wanted them all illegal, especially if a child was raped and impregnated. So that means that the child would be forced to carry the baby to term that could cause many physical and mentally painful things to happen to the child to where I would believe that causing them and forcing them to hold that fetus would be child torture. Not to mention it would rip apart their body, rip apart the poor girl's vagina. A little tiny, imagine a little nine-year-old girl has to go through that pregnancy. And that is something that Charlie Kirk proudly stood up for. He proudly said abortion should be illegal in no cases unless it was the life of the mother. So he also supported destroying children's bodies, too, is what I would believe. I mean, I think he completely outdid himself. I mean, I think it's absolutely ridiculous. The quite literally stood up for child torture because pregnancies for nine-year-old girls can be extremely painful and to have to deal with that for nine months can be very torturous and I'd like to hear your response.

So here's the deal, bro. Trump didn't claim to be a sexual predator, but he also was found guilty of sexual abuse to E.G. and Carol. So you can support something, but you don't have to say it directly in words like, OK, I can support this and that, but I don't have to say it directly in words. OK, so I don't have to say the words to understand. I think it's important for us as people to look at the evidence and say, OK, this is torturous. Let's do this. Charlie Kirk stood up for banning abortion completely illegal. Pregnancies for nine-year-old girls or younger like Lena Medina, the youngest raped and pregnant girl ever, a five-year-old girl violently raped by her dad has to hold that pregnancy for nine months. And pregnancies can be very painful for children especially It can ruin their body It can make them feel off It can cause severe physical mental and social suffering because of their bodies and mind are still growing. Young bodies are not ready for birth and face Major medical dangers. And that's why I'm saying that this could cause so much problems. Studies show that also it can cause postpartum depression rates are twice as high in young teens compared to older adults, anxiety and stress, suicidal thoughts, and also just physical distress in general, which forcing I define torture as the forced infliction of pain. So if you don't have the access to an abortion, you'd be forced in that pregnancy and it could be painful. So therefore, Charlie Kirk stood up for childbirth. The speaker is making my case. The, say, I'm going to put a lot of debate on me and turn this up on May 8th.

The reason I think that opposing abortion is standing up for child torture is because pregnancies are torturous to children. So therefore, if you force them to keep that child to term, you are putting them through a torturous situation in my mind. Because studies show that it can cause many mental and physical pain for these children over nine months. Depression, suicidal thoughts, anxiety and stress. And there's so many sources like the Adolescent Pregnancy Reviews, the World Health Organizations all show that this is causing a lot of pain and anguish and torture to these children. So you can separate the two of opposed abortion and supported torture, but you really can't at the same time. Because if you oppose abortion, something that would make her not have to go through that for nine months, then you are supporting the torture of and the pain and the anguish of a child having to carry a fetus to term. So that's why I believe that Charlie Kirk stood up for child torture.