I am using the Geographical Divine Hiddenness argument and the evidential argument from the history of science 1. If a loving God desires a universal relationship with humanity, your eternal salvation should not depend on a birthplace lottery. Yet geography remains the single greatest predictor of religious belief. Apologists might dismiss this as a genetic fallacy by arguing that a belief origin does not make it false. However, this defense fails under theism. If Christianity is true, it is wildly unexpected and conceptually incoherent that an all-loving God would make a person likelihood of being saved drastically higher simply because they were born in Rwanda instead of Thailand. 2. The natural sciences have a perfect track record of displacing the supernatural. Historically, phenomena once attributed to gods like lightning, disease, or mental illness have always eventually been explained by physics, chemistry, and biology. The reverse has never occurred. No scientist has ever investigated a mystery only for the empirical evidence to conclude that a deity did it. This one-way street strongly implies that religion is not a window into metaphysical truth. Instead, it is an evolved human tool used for social cohesion, psychological comfort, and coping with existential dread.