You mentioned we don't have sufficient evidence, but let me ask you this: can any human create a trinity of trinities Space, Time, and Matter consisting of Space: 1D, 2D, and 3D; Time: Past, Present, and Future; and Matter: Electrons, Protons, and Neutrons? You also mentioned the argument about what caused God. But let me tell you this: God is necesary instead of contingent. Think of it like a computer programer creating code on a compurer. The programer is necesary for the code to exist because if the programer didn't exist, the program couldn't be runned. 1) The existence of Jesus of Nazereth and the spread of Christianity despite persecution is independently confirmed by Tactius, a non-Christian writer, in 116 AD and also by the Jewish Historian Flavius Josephus in 93 AD and finally by the Roman governor Pliny the Younger in 112 AD. 2) Cosmic "Fine-Tuning" shows that if any aspect of the fundamental constants of physics were fine tuned, life would be impossible. Religious world views along with cosmologists across agnostic and secular worldviewd widely acknowledge said truth. 2 pieces which were independently verified by aethist and agnostic people.

That's where your wrong. Humans can not exist outside of time and space therefore we can not create the universe. If God were to exist inside of time and space, God would not be able to govern any of it therefore He is not all-powerful, nor does He exist as a creator God. However, He exists outside of time and space therefore He governs all of the universe. Saying God is necesary is not an assumption. Saying God is necesary is fact because without a Governor of Time and Space, the universe would collapse in on itself. And to your point, that's false: Early Apolistic writings such as from John and Luke confirm that Jesus was divine. No human can give power from God to other humans. Only God can. Nor can any human forgive sins. Only God can. Fine tuning changes an outcome by adjusting a variable everso slightly, and if the wrong variable was adjusted, then the suitable conditions you mentioned no longer exist, meaning that we no longer exist. And by the way, the fact that AETHISTS AND AGNOSTICS, people that do not believe in God or the existence of the Christian God, agree with that says that its not just Christian doctrine.

The fact that a supernatural deity can balance time, space, and matter while also keeping conditions for life in said universe where life is a likely possibility can not be done by even the smartest humans on earth. God has an infinite mind. And with that infinite mind comes infinite knowledge. No human on earth knows how to control every aspect of life to ensure it remains perfect. That's simply impossible. The books of Acts and Revelation, more specifically Revelation, were written around the time of Josephus. Josephus was a Jewish Historian who wrote confirming the supernatural claim of the book of Revelation. This occured in 93 AD when the book of Revelation was written only 3 years later by an exiled John on Patmos. Fine tuning demonstrates that even the slightest adjustment to conditions for existence can lead to a completely different outcome, which yes: does actually point to intentional design. The fact that Aethists and Agnostics acknowledge fine-tumning shows its widely accepted independently verified proof because it wasn't verified by someone with a bias to Christianity.

Dark energy isn't a proven physical subtance nor confirmed entity; it is instead a mathematical placeholder inssrted into General Relativity to explain why cosmic expansion appears to be accelerating. Asserting that an invisible, undetectable force fills all of space borders on non-falsafiable science makes this undistinguishable from an untested theoretical construct. Alternative astrophysical models, such as theories of gravity explain cosmic observational data without needing to imvent dark energy in the first place. Despite decades of high-sensitivity laboratory searches, zero direct physical evidence for a Dark Matter particle has ever existed. Attributing physical mads to something that conveniently interacts with zero electromagnetic radiation makes it an unobservable assumption istead of independently verified matter. The anomalous rotational speeds of galaxies can be calculated and explained by modifying our understanding of gravity at galactic scales, therefore proving that it isn't the only viable explanation Defining "normal" matter as making up only 5% of reality is exposing a flaw fudamentally in the standard model. 95% of the cosmos must be attributed to hypothetical, unobserved entities to keep the model intact. This is the only component of the trio that consists of empirically tested, verifiable physical substance, mesning 95% of the supposed composition of space reliee on inferred physics rather that direct proof. Equaring observable matter with empirical evidence with extreme theoretical objects whose ingeriors snd precise objects whose interiors amd precise mechanics remain unobservable by definition.

The aforementioned comparison is not an attempt to force God into a gap in physics, but rather to demonstrate that belief in an invisible cause based on its visible effects is a standard rational method. Dark matter and dark energy are placeuolder names for fundamentally unknown drivers of observed physical behavior, showing that science routinely accepts unobserved agencies to make sense of the universe. Similarly, philosohical arguments for God do not rely on sheer ignorance, but on inferring a sufficient cause from observed effects like contingient existence, objective cosmic order, and fine-tuning. Inferring a transcendent intellect behind the origin and tuning of the physical laws themselves addresses the overarching reason why a rational, orderly universe exists at all. Dismissing the logical connection between cosmic order and a primary cause misinterprets the argument as a "God of the gaps" claim rather than a deduction based on foundational principles.