When we are talking about free expression, then we should be particular and we should really see this topic of free expression because I think that many times when people use the term free expression, they tend to overlook what it means and just dwell on the surface level meaning of free expression. So let's look at what free expression really means. So you are a person, you want to express something. What is that you want to express, freely express that can't be expressed in your real life and does expressing a thing really have any impact on your life? Suppose, in some cases, if you look at it, you belong to a very suppressed part of the community and you have to raise your voice against some agenda, then social media does provide a conducive platform. But think about it. Even when government will regularize or just regulate it like any public community, we will obviously overlook these things that genuinely needs. We will just we will carefully look into this thing that genuinely needs attention and it would be that we will remove it. We will suppress people voice because that the whole point that I trying to raise When we will regulate it we will make sure that there is no propaganda first of all Second of all that people who genuinely are in need of expression they can express it Because 90 of this thing that we call free expression is just an agenda or propaganda that is being imposed on people If today I take 90% of phones away from people, then it won't create a huge change in their life. By change I mean the negative impact. It won't have any negative impact. Why? Because even if people, 90% of people who are living in metropolitan cities or any tier 2, tier 3 cities like in India, they won't have any negative impacts or repercussions of it. The only repercussions that they will have is what is known as withdrawal symptoms because their people are addicted to it. And I think that people tend to treat these social media platforms as a good medium of having constructive debates. But I am sorry that no constructive debates or at least 90% of the debates that happen in social media are just people trying to bend their anger. People tend to be irrational while expressing their thoughts. So I think that this notion of free expression is just reactionary expression that we are talking about. And I think that that's why regulating this social media will do more good than harm to the people.